This is a point-in-time snapshot generated live. Larger tokens may take longer while evidence is collected.
derived · 5 of 5 categories evaluated
Derived means the score is computed by fixed, deterministic rules from the collected evidence — not a human or AI opinion. The count says how many of the five implemented categories produced evaluable evidence; each missing one is cut out of the score's own digits. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.
Driven by holder concentration
Point-in-time scan ·
Investigation summary
The strongest existing scored signal, restated as the leading conclusion.
Top 10 largest token accounts are 70% or more of supply excluding pool vaults
The top 10 largest token accounts control a very high share of supply. This is a strong concentration signal and may indicate potential distribution risk.
5 of 5
implemented categories evaluated
0
evidence gaps
7
findings scored
Risk profile
Score and evidence status are separate dimensions. Select a category for a short explanation and to investigate it below.
What Evidesa found
Each finding opens into conclusion → why it matters → evidence, with technical depth in disclosures and the linked category analysis.
Plain-language interpretation
The top 10 largest token accounts control a very high share of supply. This is a strong concentration signal and may indicate potential distribution risk.
How much of the supply sits in the largest token accounts. The more supply a few accounts hold, the more the token depends on those accounts.
Why this matters
Concentration can increase dependence on a limited number of accounts, but account balances alone do not establish beneficial ownership.
What this does not establish
A synthesis of this dossier's own arithmetic, in reading order. Every sentence names the computed source it was assembled from; none is written about the evidence rather than from it.
mɔ reads 100/100, band Critical, driven by holder concentration risk.
overall score
That rests on 5 of 5 implemented categories evaluated, with no evidence gap and 7 scored findings.
coverage
The strongest scored signal is: Top 10 largest token accounts are 70% or more of supply excluding pool vaults.
leading finding
Since the previous saved observation, 5 changes were recorded at Aug 12, 2026, 05:07 UTC (1 medium-impact, 4 low-impact).
change timeline
On the selected pair's depth, a $5,000 exit moves execution about 0.1% and a round trip at that size needs roughly 2.1% to break even.
trade economics
The reading turns on liquidity depth ($6,832,387): Re-evaluate if depth falls under the $1,000 tradeable floor, or moves ±15% — the same materiality bar the change timeline records.
scenario watchpoints
Most recent change digest. 5 observed changes recorded at Aug 12, 2026, 05:07 UTC (1 medium-impact, 4 low-impact).
These are observed evidence movements from saved history — impact labels describe the change category, not a new risk verdict.
Earliest observation in this view — no preceding entry is shown, so no interval is drawn.
15 min since the previous saved observation.
Non-scored, analytical. What the pool's depth implies for slippage, the round-trip move a position needs to break even, and the size at which one exit crosses named impact thresholds. Arithmetic on public depth data — not a quote, and nothing here is constructed or submitted.
Against $6,830,959 of base-side depth — derived from the pool reserves the provider reported — a $5,000 exit moves the execution price about 0.1% on its own. A round trip at that size needs roughly 2.1% in its favour to break even, counting slippage both ways plus a 1% terminal fee twice — that fee is an illustration, not this product's claim about what any terminal charges, so substitute the rate yours publishes. This is analytical arithmetic on a constant-product model, not a quote: a router that splits an order across pools will differ, and nothing here is constructed, routed or submitted.
Break-even move by position size
Exit capacity
Derived from this dossier's own evidence: the mechanical changes that would make this reading worth re-reading. Conditions, not predictions — nothing here is a signal to act.
Liquidity depth $6,832,387
Re-evaluate if depth falls under the $1,000 tradeable floor, or moves ±15% — the same materiality bar the change timeline records.
fires on liquidity.liquidity_usd_changed
Top-10 concentration 100%
Re-evaluate if top-10 concentration moves ±10 points — the trajectory-scale shift bar; smaller material moves already appear on the change timeline.
fires on holders.top10_percentage_changed
Each condition names a change class the saved-observation ledger records — the same vocabulary the evidence watch notifies on. Nothing here predicts direction; a watchpoint is what would make this dossier worth re-reading.
Non-scored, on-demand. Compares the top owner wallets' earliest observable funding for shared sources — evidence-linked relationships with confidence and alternative readings, never identity. Wallets whose history outruns the read budget answer as not established.
A bounded on-demand read: the top owner wallets' earliest observable funding, compared for shared sources and simultaneity. Wallets whose history outruns the read budget answer as not established — a refusal, never a guess.
Non-scored, on-demand, evidence only. Reads where the creator wallet's first lamports came from and whether the token's top holders share that origin — a wallet can be replaced, its funding cannot be unspent. Matching against previous launches needs a stored cross-launch graph this build does not have.
A bounded on-demand read: the creator wallet's earliest observable funding, placed inside this token's own funding graph. A wallet can be replaced; where its first lamports came from is a fact about the launch.
The dossier as files — the document as PDF, findings and Trust-Diff history as CSV. Exports carry the same content as this page, including stated gaps.
Export is a Pro capability: this dossier as a PDF document, and its findings and Trust-Diff history as CSV data. The evidence itself is not gated — everything the files would carry is already on this page, free, including the stated gaps. See plans
Evidence investigation
Each panel explains the check before showing its evidence.
Preliminary overall risk (v0): Critical at 100/100. All 5 implemented categories provided evidence. Creator DNA is not yet implemented.
How Overall Risk is aggregated
Overall Risk is not an average of the five implemented categories: the most elevated one sets the result, so no combination of quiet categories pulls down a loud one. Risk corroborated independently across categories raises it further, by a bounded amount. Categories with insufficient evidence are excluded, so a gap can neither raise nor lower the result. The calculation is deterministic for a given evidence set. It currently starts from Holder Concentration Risk. Creator DNA is not implemented and is excluded.
Coverage
5 of 5 implemented categories evaluated · 0 evidence gaps · 7 scored findings.
What this report does not establish
Full raw evidence, addresses, and tables for this category are in the Holder Concentration analysis below.
Plain-language interpretation
The largest token account controls a very large share of supply. This is a concentration signal and may indicate potential distribution risk.
How much of the supply sits in the largest token accounts. The more supply a few accounts hold, the more the token depends on those accounts.
Why this matters
Concentration can increase dependence on a limited number of accounts, but account balances alone do not establish beneficial ownership.
What this does not establish
Full raw evidence, addresses, and tables for this category are in the Holder Concentration analysis below.
Plain-language interpretation
The selected trading pair was created less than 6 hours ago. Very new pairs carry elevated fresh-pair risk due to limited trading history.
The single largest trading pool the scan evaluated. Smaller or unlisted pools are not added together.
Why this matters
Short-term market behaviour does not establish intent. Unavailable market data is an evidence gap, not low or high risk.
What this does not establish
Full raw evidence, addresses, and tables for this category are in the Market Momentum analysis below.
Not included above, and available on request below: effective ownership, creator fingerprint.
on-demand reads
This brief interprets evidence; it does not advise. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold, and a band is a range rather than a verdict.
Mapped owner-authority set changedchanged
Largest token-account set changedchanged
2 h 22 min since the previous saved observation.
Mapped owner-authority set changedchanged
Largest token-account set changedchanged
Risk finding addedchanged
Risk finding removedchanged
Risk score changeddecreased
The depth basis is the base-side reserve the provider reported, valued at the reported price. Figures describe the selected pair only — liquidity in other pools is not counted, and nothing here accounts for what another trade does to the pool between reading this and acting.
Measures how concentrated the supply is among the largest accounts.
How much of the supply sits in the largest token accounts. The more supply a few accounts hold, the more the token depends on those accounts.
What this check examines
How much of the token supply is held by the largest token accounts returned by Solana RPC, and the owner authorities behind them when available.
What Evidesa found
The holder category score reflects concentration signals in the largest token accounts returned by RPC.
How to interpret this
Concentration can increase dependence on a limited number of accounts, but account balances alone do not establish beneficial ownership.
Scored findings
The largest token account controls a very large share of supply. This is a concentration signal and may indicate potential distribution risk.
Largest token account excluding identified pool vaults: 40.00%
The top 10 largest token accounts control a very high share of supply. This is a strong concentration signal and may indicate potential distribution risk.
Top 10 largest token accounts excluding identified pool vaults: 96.00%
The top 20 largest token accounts control most of the current supply. This may indicate potential distribution risk.
Top 20 largest token accounts excluding identified pool vaults: 96.00%
Supporting & informational signals
What this does not establish
Checks token-program controls that can affect supply and balances.
The account allowed to create new tokens. If it is revoked, no new supply can be minted by that authority.
What this check examines
The token program, mint and freeze authority state, and any Token-2022 extensions on the mint account.
What Evidesa found
Available on-chain data produced positive signals with no configured technical score impact.
How to interpret this
Revoked mint or freeze authority is a supporting control signal, not proof of safety. Active authorities or risk-bearing extensions raise Technical Risk.
Supporting & informational signals
What this does not establish
Gauges how much value is pooled for trading in the selected pair.
How much value is pooled for trading. Thin pools move more on each trade, so larger orders see more slippage.
What this check examines
Selected-pair liquidity depth, valuation-to-liquidity, returned-pair distribution, and 24-hour volume from DexScreener.
What Evidesa found
The liquidity score reflects selected-pair liquidity depth and valuation-to-liquidity ratio, with aggregate-aware reported 24-hour volume when multiple Solana pairs are returned.
How to interpret this
Reported liquidity is best-effort market evidence, not complete global liquidity, and does not guarantee a trade can or cannot be executed.
Scored findings
DexScreener returned only one Solana pair for this token. This is a conservative market-structure signal based on returned-pair data only. Other venues not returned by DexScreener may exist and are not reflected here.
Selected pair liquidity: $6,832,387.04
Supporting & informational signals
What this does not establish
Assesses short-term market behaviour from selected-pair evidence.
The single largest trading pool the scan evaluated. Smaller or unlisted pools are not added together.
What this check examines
Selected-pair price movement, turnover, pair age, and transaction mix, plus locally recorded price snapshots when available.
What Evidesa found
The market momentum score reflects market-behavior risk signals: trading pair is very new.
How to interpret this
Short-term market behaviour does not establish intent. Unavailable market data is an evidence gap, not low or high risk.
Scored findings
The selected trading pair was created less than 6 hours ago. Very new pairs carry elevated fresh-pair risk due to limited trading history.
Pair age: ~2 hours old
Supporting & informational signals
What this does not establish
Creator / Deployer Evidence is a bounded, experimental, evidence-only signal from a Solana signature search. It does not contribute to the Overall Risk score.
How to interpret this
Treat this as a lead for further review, not a conclusion. The earliest observed transaction may not be the creation transaction, and the fee payer or signer is not proof of the real creator or team.
What this does not establish
This is the earliest transaction observed within the inspected window, not a confirmed creation transaction. Earlier history may exist beyond the bounded search.
Addresses from the first observed transaction that also appear in other roles for this token.
| Address | Role in transaction | Also appears as |
|---|---|---|
| FVjgpG…mTrQEp | Fee payer |
|
Evidence only — not scored
Experimental
This optional check uses the first-observed fee payer as the seed address for a bounded search. It may take several seconds, does not run automatically, and does not affect any score.
Provisional seed from current report evidence
The server re-derives and validates the seed before running the bounded search, so the seed actually analyzed may differ.
This is a bounded historical search and may not cover the address's complete activity.
The association does not prove common ownership, identity, intent, or project quality.
The observed fee payer or signer is not proof of the token's real creator or project team. It may be a launchpad, deployment service, script wallet, PDA-related authority, or operational account. This is evidence-only and not full wallet clustering.
Data sources, their status, and server-side timing for this scan. Non-scored sources are listed for transparency and are excluded from the five implemented category scores.
Point-in-time scope
This is a point-in-time snapshot, not continuous monitoring. Market data, holder data, and metadata may change. Server-side timing shown in this report is observed during this run and is not a service-level guarantee.
Risk aggregation
Technical, holder, liquidity, social/narrative, and market momentum findings are generated from available data. The preliminary overall score (v0) is the maximum of the implemented category scores, not an average. Score bands are score ranges, not verdicts.
Creator DNA exclusion & non-scored sources
Creator DNA scoring is not yet implemented and is excluded from Overall Risk. Bounded on-demand Creator Launch History is implemented separately and is experimental and non-scored. Related-wallet and transfer-graph analysis are not implemented. Identity metadata is displayed for usability and is not security evidence.
Evidence limitations
| 3 |
| FLBD5U…s42qF5 |
| 199999999999.8 |
| 20.00% |
| 4 | 8zrXN9…fjYu15 | 159999999999.84 | 16.00% |
| 5 | 3pQhSw…SjEWj1 | 39993904917.848191 | 4.00% |
| 6 | AaX2zU…ysWwvq | 6256.703611 | 0.00% |
| 7 | 79j2ch…bmzu1k | 6256.703611 | 0.00% |
| 8 | 3HAgvk…MAd4ed | 6256.703611 | 0.00% |
| 9 | 6Z8fHz…mZbUkq | 1229.889167 | 0.00% |
| 10 | G1nyBA…L8z9pK | 0 | 0.00% |
| 11 | ER7MB7…6csjL2 | 0 | 0.00% |
| 12 | DAk371…qDv8d7 | 0 | 0.00% |
| 13 | AdjtuF…LXfQmV | 0 | 0.00% |
| 14 | AZGsNu…Tb63DQ | 0 | 0.00% |
| 15 | AFKmtx…7em4bp | 0 | 0.00% |
| 16 | 9YEgaj…B38HKA | 0 | 0.00% |
| 17 | 7ySJZn…Li1aJ8 | 0 | 0.00% |
| 18 | 7rY9VM…EZzsgd | 0 | 0.00% |
| 19 | 6owDgr…cfNXUX | 0 | 0.00% |
| 20 | 5uZBsc…eSB6M9 | 0 | 0.00% |
Supply basis: 999999999999 tokens. The RPC returned 20 largest token accounts.
This MVP uses largest token accounts, not full wallet-owner clustering. Related-wallet clustering and account classification require deeper analysis.
| Owner authority | Accounts | Supply share | Token accounts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3XuDtm…pSwyE2 | 1 | 40.00% | EuUFeu…x1nktE |
| D24pAm…Xdh1E1 | 1 | 20.00% | 3c5ZyB…RbVMyr |
| FTBs9x…AMkcoX | 1 | 20.00% | FLBD5U…s42qF5 |
| 6k8cNt…VTSkv6 | 1 | 16.00% | 8zrXN9…fjYu15 |
| DDcwjg…yZtD9Q | 1 | 4.00% | 3pQhSw…SjEWj1 |
| B2Gsbk…GA728a | 1 | 0.00% | AaX2zU…ysWwvq |
| 5yYKp1…89BMuG | 1 | 0.00% | 79j2ch…bmzu1k |
| DBbqPA…Rg6zMA | 1 | 0.00% | 3HAgvk…MAd4ed |
| A4W9v5…uaMp1t | 1 | 0.00% | 6Z8fHz…mZbUkq |
| 3LoAYH…vkzd76 | 1 | 0.00% | G1nyBA…L8z9pK |
Owner authority mapping shows which on-chain authorities control the largest returned token accounts. An owner authority may be a program address, PDA, exchange-controlled account, or individual wallet. This is not full wallet clustering.
| Market | Exchange | Pair | Reported liquidity | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mɔ / USDC | orca | Selected pairDDcwjg…yZtD9Q | $6,832,387.04 | $1,041.09 |
Liquidity depth and valuation-to-liquidity ratio scoring use the selected pair. When multiple returned Solana pairs provide volume, the low-volume signal uses their aggregate reported 24-hour volume.
DexScreener-reported liquidity across returned Solana pairs is best-effort market evidence, not complete global liquidity. Centralized exchange liquidity, unavailable pools, and venues not returned by DexScreener may be excluded.